![]() ![]() In an English sentence, the recipient of an Ownership, and has the same meaning as ( -‘s ) in English: Or addressing someone, and is the same as the nominative except for 1 stĭeclension masculine singular nouns ending in -us or –ius. The accusative can also indicate extent of Unimportant, so you could reverse the words and the meaning would stay the The subject of a sentence is always in the NominativeĬase, and the object in the Accusative case: The object (the person to whom the action is done) goes at the end: Person performing the action) usually goes at the start of the sentence, while For example, the subject of a sentence (the ![]() ![]() In English, a noun’s role in a sentence isĭetermined by its position in that sentence, and/or by any prepositions Here is a list of what we offer:Ī) Introduction, Nominative and Accusative: The following courses will provide you with some help based on the lessons you choose. Learning Latin can help you communicate with other people who speak Latin. to help you with your Latin grammar Enjoy our courses! Latin Lessons I haven't seen a corresponding genitive plural peiōrium used anywhere in ancient texts.If you're trying to learn the most essential topics about Latin you will find some useful resources including a course about adjectives, adverbs, articles, gender (feminine, masculine.), negation, nouns, numbers, phrases, plural, prepositions, pronouns, questions, verbs, vocabulary, excercises. For example, comparative adjectives generally are inflected as consonant stems (an exception to the general tendency for Latin third-declension adjectives to be i-stems), but the non-neuter accusative plural of comparatives is sometimes found ending in -ōrīs (as in the example of peioris asked about in this question). I think that some words may have an attested accusative plural in -īs but no attested genitive plural in -ium. constantes et similia, Allen and Greenough §77, §117 and §118 have some information on the use of this ending (although some of what this source says about etymology is out of date). Your suggestion that accusative plural -īs is possible if the word has a genitive plural ending in -ium is a good rule of thumb, but has exceptions.Īs per the answer I posted in reply to the prior question Constantis vs. This might be the reason why so many modern editions normalize spellings by replacing accusative plural -īs with -ēs (unless the word has an accusative singular in -im). Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be any rule that is both simple and complete. ![]() My first guess was that one could say simply “anything that has a genitive plural in -ium will have its accusative plural written as -is. Now, given that one has to face texts which have intruded the loathsome -is, what are the rules? They also add that polysyllabic stems in nt are in a very real sense stems in i ( 54 though their wording is more Victorian than mine). Gildersleeve and Lodge say for vowel stems in i ( 57.5) that “ -is is found frequently in the classical period along with the later termination -es, which supplants -is wholly in the early empire”. I need to de-obsolesce, because I am getting tired of asking “what is this genitive singular doing in maerentis amicos?”. Rudyard Kipling uses this - maerentes amicos and so on - which I suppose shows that I am a contemporary of Kipling. I am being driven round the bend by people’s insistence on “playing Horace on original instruments” and I need some way out of the morass.Īt school the 3rd declension accusative plural ending was -es and that was that. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |